[Why] Can't we just get along?

It's just words, right?

"Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you....."

Got up this morning and started browsing through the news. On thing lead to another and in moments, I found an article by a TED fellow. I love TED. Great ideas. The pen is mightier than the sword, and all that crap.

"We have nothing to fear but...."

Just the other day a bunch a Yale frat-boys had their new members go through an initiation rite. But this time, it hurt. Not only the new members, who demonstrated they lacked common sense. Not just the fraternity, or Yale the university. It hurt everybody. Everywhere. We lost dignity.

"Four score and seven years ago...."

What was this deed gone awry? The recruits were marched through a section of Yale where the female dorms are located. They were blindfolded, all chanting "No means yes. Yes means anal." The result was a firestorm of disgust, aimed at the recruits and the fraternity.

It's just words, right?

That's when I found a response titled "Purple Pill", written by the TED fellow. Esther Chae is as eloquent as the frat-boys were dumb. Read her thoughts here. Do it now.

Ahhh, chants and sound bites. The inspire us. They cause us to act. But as Ester points out, there are real people who feel the effect of those chants and slogans. For good and bad. It's easy to forget that, while swept along by a simple slogan.

"We hold these truths to be self evident, that all......"

It's just words, right?

"I know you would have never done what you did, if you knew it was me...."

But it is me. And you. A slogan stands between us. Or not. What will we choose?

There's this pretty tree across the street.

It's fall, and the leaves have turned brilliant yellow. They are particularly striking at night when illuminated by the nearby streetlight. So I decided to try to get a shot of it at night. To capture its brilliance.

But as is so often the case, photographing high contrast and intense color scenes rarely come out like you see them with your eye. Night shots are no different than sunset photos. Any bozo can do them, and someone somewhere will fawn over the shot as though it took actual talent to capture it. Though the shots don't ever capture the intensity of the scene, something interesting always happens. Just not what you planned and saw, unless you are really good. Or stupidly lucky. That happens too. Did nearly everything wrong in these shots but still, they didn't turn out entirely crappy. (You can click on each photo to see a larger version).

Camera: Nikon D70 digital SLR

Camera: Nikon D70 digital SLR

Decided to see what my new iTouch camera could do in low light (photo below). Kinda ugh, kinda okay. Not that it should be able to handle this scene all that well. Considering what it is, the iTouch (and iPhone) can take surprisingly good photos. I have been asked many times over the years what camera someone should buy, and my advice remains unchanged. The cheapest, simplest camera you will actually take with you and use. Then spend a little time learning about composition and lighting. If you do that, you'll soon be taking better photos with that $89 point and shoot camera than the dude who insists on spending $1500 on a digital SLR. Use the money you save to go on a fun vacation instead. And don't forget to show us the great photographs you took with that "substandard" camera that snobs on photo sites deride.

Have doubts about what a cheap camera is capable of? Check out the portfolio of a professional photographer, Chase Jarvis, of shots taken with his iPhone. This guys has at least $20,000+ worth of gear scattered throughout his studio. He has gear for every occasion. See what a professional can do with a $300 phone/camera. Then ask yourself, is it the gear or the photographer that makes the difference between merely okay and great shots?

Camera: iTouch (4th Generation)

While wandering around and looking at angles and color and contrast, I heard a sound nearby and out of the darkness came a buddy I recently met.

Camera: iTouch (4th Generation)

One of the neighbors horses decided to came over to have a brief talk. Sniffed the iTouch a little, then insisted I give it some scratches behind its ears. It's pretty fun living in a artsy-fartsy theater and college town where you can walk from your house to downtown in ten minutes, yet still pet horses and sheep across the street.

For my daughters, and anyone else who gives a rip.

Recently I sat to write down what my spiritual beliefs are. Have you ever done that? Put it all in print? Try it sometime. It is harder than it appears.

Anyway, I wrote it mostly for my daughters. Now in their late 20's and early 30's (!), I had never let them know my spiritual beliefs. Decided it was time to do so, for all they ever knew is dad beliefs are different than mom's. I also wrote it for my wife, Barb. The only person I have ever discussed my beliefs with, I thought it would be handy for her to see a summation should I croak the next day. I also wrote it for a dear friend who has recently altered her spiritual journey. A ying to her yang?

Since sending it to the selected few, there has been a ripple effect. Requests of "Can I read it?" have come from more than a few quarters. In the past I would have brushed such requests off. My spiritual beliefs are nobodies business but my own. But I have become reckless with age. So what the hell. I'll make my drivel easy to find. Almost assured to piss many off, here's what I wrote.... though keep in mind the thoughts are subject to future change.

And to my daughters, who will stumble across this someday - I love you dearly. Don't let "the powers that be" influence you. Question your presumptions more vigorously than your critics. Then, listen to your spirit and heart. You'll know what to do.

I have sworn upon the alter of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.

- Thomas Jefferson

Lindsay and Carly,

 

You have asked about my spiritual beliefs, which in the past I was reluctant to discuss. For no other reason than you were attending the Presbyterian Church with mom, and I didn't want to interfere with that in any way possible. Since you are no longer attending that church, here is a summary of my beliefs. Consider this a starting point in time for comparison sake, should something strange or wonderful happen to me tomorrow. 

 

But it's not really a starting point. It's the end-point after having explored fifty-plus years worth of changing ends. Wait. That statement is incorrect. It's actually the middle of my thoughts and beliefs because "the end" has always been somewhere out in the distance - shrouded by a light fog. I suspect it will always be. So here goes, without cautions and wherefores. My current beliefs about religion, spirituality, physics, philosophy, star gazing, insect gazing, why the topics intersect, and how they are all tied together. As always, subject to change.

 

A brief history

 

I was raised a Presbyterian and went to church often. My mom was the church secretary, so not going was never an option. I have the attendance "medals" to prove it. Testament to eleven or so years of near-perfect attendance at sunday school and church sermons. But attending, and being present are two different things. I was present for about the first third of the time, and merely attended the rest to satisfy family wishes.

 

The first sign I was about to dive into religious purgatory came at a young age. In sunday school I was introduced to the most revered tenant of religion: You must accept God into your heart before you can enter heaven. Or the kingdom. The words heaven and kingdom were spoke as though they started with a capital "H" or "K", to emphasize how important it was that we understand. All the kids in my class nodded solemnly. But I had been introduced to what an atheist is. Darned books.

 

"So an atheist can't go to heaven?"

 

"Right", said my teacher.

 

Well, okay. An atheist chooses their belief. I had also read a children's book about Northwest Indians and their culture. As near as I could tell, Indians had lived for centuries without knowing a stitch about God. They sure as hell weren't Presbyterians. "What about the Indians? They didn't believe in God. What happened to them?" I visualized millions of Indians suspended in a never-world.

 

"Uhhh......", she said.

 

A few weeks later I asked our minister. He stumbled through an unconvincing, rambling answer. All I could think about was those Indians. Are they forever lost?

 

When one door closes, another opens. Not sure whether it is true or not, but in this case: Religion lost a child, a teenager discovered spirituality. At a YMCA, of all places. More accurately, in the woods of the Olympic Peninsula and on the shores of the Pacific Ocean during YMCA trips. It was there I found a place that connected to now, and infinity. Whenever I feel a need for inspiration, I head for the hills or shores..... to watch and listen. That's where my temple is.

 

So that's the brief version of how I arrived where I am today. Let's get to the what, and reveal the why later. Here is the "I believe...." part. It's not a how-to. I also wouldn't presume to tell you it's 'right'. It is merely my framework, an ever changing scaffold from which I alone build.

 

Core Beliefs

 

  • The core tenant is this notion: We are granted, at birth, a free will. To do with as we please. Good, bad, indifferent or amazing. It is all possible. I choose. You choose. To explore. Question. Ignore. Discover. The paths we choose are ours alone. There is no divine inspiration or intervention. No preordained plan. No destiny. Thus, we are truly free - in the most magnificently inspirational, and spectacularly frightening, manner possible.
  • All you need to accomplish your goals is provided. It may not be easy to find, but it is there. For what you want to build, what you want to use, what you want to accomplish, and what you wish to think. Everything you need is available but the supply is not infinite, so choose wisely. You are a guardian of the supply, not the owner.
  • Be curious. Always. Don't force anything. A little discomfort is always good. Let an idea or opportunity find you. In short, Get out of our own way. 
  • Be generous. Be kind. We are the ultimate social-ape. Our collective intelligence far exceeds that of even the most intelligent group of individuals. So share your knowledge and wisdom. Time and money. Your good nature. Your concern and hopes for others.
  • The Ten Commandments and Golden Rule is all the religion you will ever need. Don't waste your time reading the rest. You will spend a lifetime trying to live up to the standards within those two documents. And you will fail. Keep trying.

 

That's It?

 

First, let me emphasize that I have never accomplished executing my core beliefs into anything resembling an ideal. They serve as an unattainable goal worth striving for, and a guide. Secondly, I intentionally left each passage brief for a reason. I know somewhat well what fleshes out these concepts in my life, but thought it best to leave them "bare" because there is a chance one may resonate with you, but for different reason. Hopefully something did, for you. Let me know your thoughts. I would be thrilled to hear them. Now, though, I will try to describe how I arrived at these core beliefs. And lastly, a housekeeping note. From here on I will lump the terms spiritual and religion together, and their variants as well. I know there are differences between the two, quite substantial actually, but unless necessary to make a particular point I will settle for the time being on using "religion" as a catch-all term. Also being used as a catch-all for the sake of brevity, I will lump Allah, Jehovah, Buddah, Supreme Being and other such terms together under "God".

 

I rarely discuss the topics above with anyone other than Barb, because my opinions are so often viewed as being really "out there'. As though coming from a second universe (more on that in a moment). But on the rare occasion I engage in discussions, the first question asked is usually "Do you believe in God?" My reply is always "I don't know." I'm not sure whether there is a God, so I sit squarely atop the fence on this subject. For most, my waffling opinion automatically disqualifies me from being able to have an intelligent discussion regarding religion, or to have beliefs remotely resembling those found in a spiritual soul. I believe having such attitude is very short sighted, but I'll never convince those who have made up their minds otherwise.

 

According to the book of Genesis, God created the earth and heavens. According to research physicists, maybe so, maybe not. We're not saying. I side more with the physicists view, but only recently has scientific discoveries fallen into alignment with my long standing views. Looking at the vastness of space and the intricacy of life on this planet, many see this as proof that only God could have created it. I look at the same vastness and intricacy and wonder why God would create such a monstrous set of objects if we (the earth) are the only live beings to work with. Overkill, isn't it? Or is there other life? If so, do "they" have their religions, too? It's very unlikely that if this is so, our religious beliefs would jibe with theirs. We can't agree amongst ourselves. Would beings from a different section of the universe be more advanced than we, less, or the same? Better able to assimilate behind a unified ideal, unlike us? In short, why all the shit out there? The Holy Book is silent in that regard.

 

Back to the physicists. The Holy Grail in the study of physics has been to find the Unified Theory which will tie all the loose threads together. As it stands now, each proven concept (relativity, string, quantum mechanics) has unique problems when scaled to tiny or massive scales. Whew. The mystery surrounding God's creation of the universe is still relatively safe. However, during the last five years a group of physicists have come up with what may be the holy grail creator, and I don't use that term lightly. It turns out a very long held belief, that something can't be made from nothing, is wrong. It IS possible and on a cosmic scale. This could toss the "Only God could have created this" theory on its ear. Often used as yet another reason to believe, what if this idea were not certain? Or is flat out wrong? It would shift the debate to "Maybe God could have done this, but natural forces could have do it as well. We simply don't know." This latest development is probably keeping religious leaders up at night.

 

Those pesky physicists have also made another discovery. It is not only possible, it is highly likely we are not the only universe to exist. So see, my ideas JUST MAY originate from a second universe after all, and I don't know it. Leaving that absurd thought aside, knowing multiple universes may exist should throw a whole new light on our religious studies. Uncertainty is the friend and enemy of all religions. Uncertainty as defined by Elders and pundits, at least, and lavish attention is paid to nurturing our hopes and fears in order to keep us coming back to church.They define the hopes we are to aspire to based on a narrow set of constraints. What if those most basic and revered constraints are tossed to the wind by science? Religion and science have always maintained a shaky level of cordiality. How quickly will that dissolve if, or more likely, when it is proven multiple universes exist? I'll stick with my core beliefs to avoid getting anywhere near that all-but-certain bloodbath. I'm confused enough as it is.

 

A word about The Word. I'm not sure what to think about it. Yep, pure blasphemy on my part. Not that everything within the bible is intrinsically horrid, or to even a significant amount. That's not my problem. But I have yet to find a True Believer who will admit the Bible has obvious shortcomings. For one thing, it was written by humans based on their recall of events. By any measure this should immediately bring out the red flags. We have all participated in the game at school where a short message is repeated from person to person, and by the time it reaches the last person the message is essentially mangled. Most any cop can tell you about interviewing witnesses to a robbery, and finding nearly as many descriptions of what happened as there are people being interviewed. Brain science has proven, within the last fifteen years, that humans are among the worst species on the planet at accurately recalling events. Gerbils and robins are vastly superior to us in this respect. Yet we choose to believe as gospel (no pun intended) the word of people, eyewitnesses we are told, to events a couple thousand years ago and more. Were they better at recall back then? Maybe, but we have no proof either way. Further, it was written by people who believed the world was flat, the sun rotated around the stars, and slavery, accompanied by a good dose of eye gouging, was acceptable. Okay, they didn't know better. I can accept that. But does that mean we should feel compelled to accept each phrase as literal truth? Fundamentalists, true believers, and a lot of not-so-true believers say yes. This subject, too, is bound to cause people to view me as a pariah for I say ignore a fair amount of what was written. There is more to debate here. I tolerate bible thumpers quite easily, even though I disagree with many of their views (and constraints). The last entry in my core beliefs sums it up for me in this area. What counts is applying the important principles to our lives. Why do people insist on making religion more difficult than necessary? An insider club with a secret handshake to learn. It's tough enough to do in a basic form. Like Jesus did. Oops. Shouldn't have said that. I'm not supposed to be a believer. Everyone who knows me, knows that.

 

I'm rambling again. My bad habit. Besides, who cares what I think? Nobody. I'm on the fringe looking in. Haven't sat through a sermon since I was 16 years old. Haven't studied the bible six ways to Sunday. Haven't joined the masses in song and worship. This tome is long on proclamations, short on substance and fact. Even worse, my "church" is found anywhere a bunch of trees, birds, mountains, insects and water intersect. Not much of a church for most, but it shines with brilliance for me. The residents there "talk" to me, pass along their wisdom of the ages, though I am not much of a believer in mysticism - which is necessary to believe an insect can talk to me in such a way. One of the many, many contradictions within my beliefs, yet to be worked out. I guess that is the crux of my confusion. Choosing what is right to do on this earth is fairly easy to understand, though hugely difficult to do. Aligning my beliefs with the rhythms of nature and the universe - that's a real challenge. But a task I think would be helpful for when one dies. There is such a huge universe out there. So huge, that to believe when one dies, one merely goes to heaven seems..... absurd. Or is wishful thinking. I firmly believe that. Want to know why? Because an ant told me so. Okay, not really. But it gets at the general idea. I believe you can learn more about God and spirit by "talking" with nature, than you will ever learn in a church. You learn to see and begin to understand how the threaded rhythms, and occasional jolts, effect your life. About the ebb and flow of pressures, and how randomness is a normal state. 

 

A word about getting out of your own way. I stole that line. Heard it in the movie "Bagger Vance" and it really resonated with me. Have always had reservations about the popular concept of visualization. The idea you can practice a task or goal in your mind to the point that when finally taking action, it becomes second nature. I can see this as being helpful to a degree, but the practice comes with constraints. What happens when events don't unfold as you visualized? Your preparation is toast. Back to square one. That dramatic shortcoming in the process is why the idea of "getting out of your own way" appeals to me.

 

Rather than prepping your mind as with the visualization method, one quiets the mind. You throw out the all garbage floating around. The expectations. The preparation. Instead, you melt into the moment. You become a blank slate, alert to everything but not thinking about anything. Just aware of your presence in that brief moment. In the movie, the example of "getting out of you own way" was about making a single golf shot. There are many ways to make the shot, but there is only one best way. So your choice is whether you try to find out what that shot is, or.... you can let it find you. I know from my sports playing days, my best moments happened when I was so totally in the moment, the best shot seemingly came from nowhere. But it really didn't. It didn't mystically appear, as some would assert. God didn't have a plan that included my winning a game. No, I had found the perfect shot simply because I had somehow removed the clutter that was getting in my way. I helped it find me. It's so easy to do. Yet is also hard to do - all the time.

 

Which brings us back to the part about having a free will. This is the where I get the most spiritual. At some point during my "there is/isn't a God" vacillations, I considered this question: What would a loving God's most cherished gift to us be? A lot came to mind, but then it hit me. It wouldn't be anything about Him (or Her, let's be fair). A loving God wouldn't consider giving a selfish gift. No, it would have to be about you. Each, you. And would be the most incredible gift possible. Hmmm.

 

Discovering what 'The Gift' could be was easier than expected. An ant blurted it out one day. Naw, just screwing with you. I had been married to Barb for a fairly long time. Long enough to have been told point blank by four friends that if anything happened between Barb and I, they would be on her doorstep the next morning. Thanks for the heads up, you neanderthal jerks. I also knew of two guys who had taken serious runs at making Barb the center of their universe, since our marriage. I even dropped Barb off for a dinner date with one of the guys that I knew was trying to win her over. Drove her there! Barb was oblivious to his intent until half way through their 'date', and was quite angry with me after learning that I sensed what he was up to. How many husbands would be strange enough to do that for the wife they love?

 

But that's the point. Exactly the point. It's all about free will. I love Barb so much that I am willing to help her leave me if that is what it takes to make her happy. It's her decision. Her path to choose. It's her free will. To stay or to leave. No repercussions. No anger. Can you imagine a more grand gift to give someone you truly love? I can't. And the joy it brings in return is incredible. No, it is beyond incredible to be with someone who chooses to be with you of their own free will, rather than their feeling like they should be with you because of a twisted sense of obligation.

 

So, what if I were A God and applied that idea on a worldly scale? What would happen? You would be given absolute freedom to accept and follow, or to walk away. The freedom to bounce back, forth and around. Try many paths on for size to see what fits, and what doesn't. I believe that is what happens. You are not directed along certain paths, and there isn't a plan for you. But there is faith. Faith in your ability to lead a life of virtue and compassion. To lead a good life because you have been given free will. Whatever path you take is up to you, and at the end of life you must make yet another decision - with your free will, of course.

 

Makes more sense to me than that rigamarole taught by churches. And seems more in line with the rhythms of nature, which also chooses its path though a form of free will. I love neat and tidy endings. Don't you?

 

In closing, I love this line:

 

"I had a different teacher."


-Dad

Courage, soul and spirit

Some of you may remember Alex Karras. I always admired him. A real character, he is a combination of brutish strength and thoughtfulness with a sense of humor. Recently found a quote attributed to him, and wanted to pass it along:

"It takes more courage to reveal insecurities than to hide them. More strength to relate to people than to dominate them. More manhood to abide by throughout principles than blind reflex. Toughness is in the soul and spirit, not in the muscles and an immature mind."

~Alex Karras

Too good, or not?

 I like people with an irreverent attitude who say things that make you think. Apparently, around the year 2000 a letter was published called "Why can't I own a Canadian?" It doesn't take long to learn the origin of this letter seems murky. There are various claims as to the authors name, and who it was addressed to.

What if we opt to put that debate aside for a moment, and consider instead what it says? Below, I have removed the parts that are in question, and have left what I consider to be the meat. If you have seen the "original", I know some will question my decisions of worthiness. If so, fine. We disagree. [see update below] The content is worth thinking about, no matter which side of the issue(s) you fall on...

"Why can't I own a Canadian?"

"Thank you for doing so much to educate people regarding God's Law. When someone tries to defend the homosexual lifestyle, for example, I simply remind them that Leviticus 18:22 clearly states it to be an abomination. I do need some advice regarding some other elements of God's Laws and how to follow them.

  1. Leviticus 25:44 states that I may possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are from neighboring nations. A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can't I own Canadians?
  2. I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her?
  3. I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her period of menstrual uncleanliness - Lev.15: 19-24. The problem is how do I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offense.
  4. When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odor for the Lord - Lev.1:9. The problem is my neighbors. They claim the odor is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them?
  5. I have a neighbor who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself, or should I ask the police to do it?
  6. A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an abomination, Lev. 11:10, it is a lesser abomination than homosexuality. I don't agree. Can you settle this? Are there 'degrees' of abomination?
  7. Lev. 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle-room here?
  8. Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by Lev.19:27. How should they die?
  9. I know from Lev. 11:6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig makes me unclean, but may I still play football if I wear gloves?
  10. My uncle has a farm. He violates Lev.19:19 by planting two different crops in the same field, as does his wife by wearing garments made of two different kinds of thread (cotton/polyester blend). He also tends to curse and blaspheme a lot. Is it really necessary that we go to all the trouble of getting the whole town together to stone them? Lev.24:10-16. Couldn't we just burn them to death at a private family affair, like we do with people who sleep with their in-laws? (Lev. 20:14)

The letter closes with this: "God's word is eternal and unchanging." My question: Is that true?

[Update] My friend, Le Hook, questioned why I felt the letter, as referenced, was tainted in serious ways (see first paragraph above). He's a pretty smart guy, so that helped me realize I hadn't been as clear as I should have been (meaning I stunk up the place the first time around). Here's the clarification that I sent him, which also betrays my sentiment towards the letter (something I wanted to avoid):

GST: Le, the point I attempted to make is that the authors name is uncertain, and it is questionable who the letter was actually addressed to. Those errors/omissions taint an otherwise great letter. Further, slyly throwing Schlessinger's religion (in practical effect, her) under the bus adds nothing to the discussion and is a cheap shot under any circumstance. For those who disagree with the sentiments, the factual errors and personal challenges are "easy outs" and will be used to dismiss the entirety. Why open that door unnecessarily?

LH: Now I've got it.

(Lee, I hope I do.) :)